What the Scalar Flower instrument tests, what it has found, what it has not, and how the null model is computed. The instrument is open about its method, open about its limits, and built to be falsified.
See the Verdict Ledger for the complete, up-to-date list of every pre-registered test and its honest verdict — nulls and falsifications first.
The Scalar Flower is a wave-superposition construction. The planets are treated as coherent wave sources with measured synodic periods, the lunar node and the galactic center are taken as the two anchors, and the resulting field is rendered on a Flower-of-Life lattice that is the chosen geometry of the instrument — not a discovery. The mathematics are exact and reproducible. The meaning assigned to the geometry is symbolic craft on real computation. The full construction is on The Method page.
A Scalar Flower reading is a galactic invariant: it does not change when you change zodiac, house system, or calendar, because it is measured against the galaxy itself — the Sun's direction of travel and the galactic center — not against any human convention. Bring any map you like; the sky underneath is the same. Every astrologer, every tradition, computes the same field. One sky, every map.
A guardrail, stated plainly: this names the invariance and our choice to read against galactic ground — it is not a claim that the galaxy exerts a force. The aim's intrinsic angle is invariant; the galactic anchor is a disclosed reading convention. The lattice registers; we do not claim it transmits.
Every claim made by the instrument is tested against a random-epoch null: 2,000 random skies drawn from six centuries (1700–2300) of real orbital correlations. The real sky's reading is then compared to the distribution of the random skies' readings. If a feature of the real sky's reading is not statistically distinguishable from the random-sky distribution, the instrument reports it as consistent with chance — not as significant.
The instrument ships with its null model on the chart panel. Every field-reading shows the random-epoch p-value next to the observed value. The user can see the base rate.
Every claim the instrument makes has been pre-registered and tested — the question and the statistical procedure fixed before the data was examined — and every verdict, including every null and falsification, is published in full.
All 23 pre-registered tests, with their honest verdicts — nulls and falsifications listed first. That page is the authoritative record; the vocabulary (NULL, FALSIFIED, UNRESOLVED, REAL, SPLIT) is defined there.
The pre-registered tests were reviewed in three rounds by an external code-reading reviewer (referred to in the project records as Fable). Each round produced a written response. The three responses are kept in the project's internal record. A summary of the audit-driven corrections is in the white paper introduction.
Look at the field. See whether the geometry resonates with what you know of the person. Decide for yourself what it means. The instrument is the instrument — the practitioner is the reader.